Top 10 Linux FUD Patterns, Part 1

15 01 2008

The following is my Top 10 list of themes used by anti-Linux FUD campaigns. This list is based on observations made over my years of following the Linux market. The ranking loosely correlates to frequency of usage and is somewhat subjective at best. Understanding each pattern will help you recognize a nicely-prepared piece of FUD when you encounter it. Each will be covered in more depth in subsequent posts (links in the list).

  1. Linux has a steep learning curve.
  2. Linux is not “officially” supported.
  3. With Linux, you cannot access old files or share new files with others.
  4. There are no good software titles for Linux.
  5. Linux is not secure.
  6. Linux is low-quality software.
  7. Linux software is always behind the curve.
  8. Linux will void your warranty.
  9. Microsoft will sue you if you use Linux.
  10. The total cost of ownership for Linux is too high.

More to come!
-Brandon

  Go To Part 2>>

Actions

Information

19 responses

30 03 2008
Trial By Hacker « Linux FUD

[...] By Hacker 30 03 2008 In the fifth installment of my Top 10 List of Linux FUD patterns, I discussed various security measures used in Linux distros. Last week, [...]

15 04 2008
Top 10 Linux FUD Patterns, Part 7 « Linux FUD

[...] of tax software for Linux…ah, and that last point is a great segway into the next item on my Top 10 List, Linux software is always behind the [...]

15 04 2008
Top 10 Linux FUD Patterns, Part 6 « Linux FUD

[...] and neither result in a useful conclusion. That’s the topic of this sixth installment of my Top 10 List of Linux FUD patterns, the accusation that Linux is low-quality software. To recognize when FUD of [...]

26 05 2008
Windows ainda é mais melhor do que Linux - CMilfont Tech

[...] no primeiro parágrafo 10 FUDs célebres. O título foi provocativo e chamativo para comprovar um [...]

18 09 2008
Tom

When is this going to be continued? By the way, installing Linux on a windows machine can void your warranty. Usually only for software though. For hardware it normally doesn’t matter. Though there are cases where a company has said that the hardware failure was due to the person ‘tampering’ with the computer. But fighting it seemed to have worked.

22 09 2008
brinkleybw

Tom,

Actually, I hope to finish this series very soon. I’ve had several events in my personal life preclude me from spending the time to do it right. The last items are also very touchy ones, bordering on legal advice, so I must write with caution (and disclaimers)! I will do my best to expedite this.

Thanks for the input!
-Brandon

24 09 2008
Tom

Me again. Voided warranty confirmed. I emailed HP to ask if they had Linux drivers for a certain laptop I am thinking of getting. Here’s the answer:

“The HP Pavilion dv9925nr (FE695UA#ABA) is warranted as configured and any change to that configuration may void the warranty. The only drivers that are available for the HP Pavilion dv9925nr are for the Microsoft Windows Vista operating system.”

I do notice the use of the word ‘may’. Still something to think about if you rely on warranties though. One should also note that Linux itself is not the cause of the voided warranty. The actual cause is “…any change to that configuration…”. So I guess technically, installing FireFox could void your warranty. Sneaky bastards.

20 10 2008
Getting Back On Track « Linux FUD

[...] and foremost, I plan to finish out the Top Ten Linux FUD Patterns. Seven down and three to [...]

10 11 2008
Top 10 Linux FUD Patterns, Part 8 « Linux FUD

[...] This is one fear that prevents some people from making the leap to Linux, which is why it is on my Top 10 List of Linux FUD Patterns. The short answer is, it depends; however, there are steps that you can take to increase your [...]

Leave a comment